Big Tech Is Making Index Funds Riskier. Here's What Advisors Can Do.

Commentary December 12, 2024 at 04:57 PM
Share & Print

What You Need To Know

  • In 2023, the Magnificent Seven contributed about 62% of the S&P 500's total return.
  • The correlation between these tech stocks has increased, meaning that they tend to move together.
  • Students of market history should recognize that market leadership can shift rapidly.
7e/ac/80c345ed45a1ab61d77dea1ed085/oconnell-john-640.jpg

The state of the U.S. stock market presents a complex set of challenges that merit careful consideration by advisors and investors alike.

The unprecedented concentration of market value in the "Magnificent Seven" technology companies — Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Nvidia, Meta and Tesla — has created both remarkable gains and significant systemic risks that could affect the broader market's stability.

This has led to a situation in which the performance of a handful of companies can dramatically influence the entire market's direction.

As of early 2024, the Magnificent Seven accounted for about 28% of the S&P 500's total market capitalization, a level of concentration not seen since the 1970s. To put this in perspective:

  • In 2019, these same companies represented about 15% of the index.
  • During the peak of the 2000 dot-com bubble, the top seven companies comprised roughly 17% of the S&P 500.
  • In the 1970s, the most concentrated period before now, the top seven companies made up about 20% of the index.

The effects of this concentration are evident in market returns:

  • In 2023, the Magnificent Seven contributed about 62% of the S&P 500's total return.
  • When excluding these seven companies, the remaining 493 stocks in the index showed significantly more modest gains.
  • The average price-to-earnings ratio of the Magnificent Seven of approximately 35x is nearly double the broader market average of 19x.

This level of concentration creates systemic risks:

  • A 10% decline in these seven stocks would trigger a 2.8% drop in the S&P 500, even if all other stocks remained unchanged.
  • Index funds, which now represent over 40% of all stock market assets, are forced to maintain these concentrated positions, increasing the risks in index funds should these positions lose value.
  • The correlation between these stocks has increased, meaning that they tend to move together. That amplifies both gains and losses.

Valuation Concerns in Tech 

Current valuations of many technology companies, particularly in the semiconductor and artificial intelligence sectors, have reached concerning levels. For example:

  • Nvidia trades at about 35x forward sales, compared to a semiconductor industry average of 4x.
  • The combined market capitalization of the Magnificent Seven ($12 trillion) exceeds the GDP of every country except the United States and China.
  • These companies trade at an average enterprise value to EBITDA ratio of 25x, versus 15x for the broader market.

These elevated valuations echo historical market bubbles:

  • The 1970s Nifty Fifty saw companies like Polaroid reach 90x earnings before falling 90%.
  • During the 2000 tech bubble, Cisco peaked at 150x earnings before declining over 80%.
  • The 1989 Japanese asset price bubble saw the Nikkei 225 lose 60% of its value when concentration risks unwound.

Supply Chain Vulnerabilities

The semiconductor industry, crucial to many of these tech giants, faces significant supply chain challenges. The concentration of chip manufacturing in specific geographic regions, particularly Taiwan, creates geopolitical risks.

Additionally, the complex nature of semiconductor production means that disruptions at any point in the supply chain can have cascading effects throughout the industry. Some of the concerns that I see in the market include:

  • Taiwan produces 92% of advanced semiconductors (sub-7nm), creating significant geopolitical risk.
  • The average semiconductor factory costs $10 billion and takes five years to build.
  • Lead times for semiconductor equipment can exceed 18 months.
  • Raw material costs have increased 15% to 20% annually in recent years.

For companies like Nvidia, these supply chain constraints could materially affect their ability to meet market demand. Some of the concerning constraints include:

  • 90% of Nvidia's AI chips are manufactured by TSMC in Taiwan.
  • Production capacity is fully booked through 2024 and early 2025.
  • New U.S. export restrictions to China affect 25% of Nvidia's potential market.
  • The risk of trade tariffs against China is increasing in the U.S. political climate.

While strong demand for its products has allowed Nvidia to maintain pricing power, any significant supply disruption could affect the firm’s ability to meet earnings expectations, potentially triggering a reassessment of its market valuations.

Given these challenges, advisors and investors should consider these four strategies to protect their portfolios:

1. Enhanced Diversification

Look beyond traditional market-cap-weighted index funds to achieve true diversification. Consider:

  • Equal-weight S&P 500 funds that reduce exposure to the largest companies;
  • Mid-cap and small-cap stocks that may offer growth potential with less concentration risk;
  • International markets that provide exposure to different economic cycles and growth drivers;
  • Direct indexing as a hedge strategy to reduce concentration risk.

2. Sector Rotation

Implement a strategic allocation to sectors that historically perform well during periods of market stress, including:

  • Consumer staples companies with strong pricing power;
  • Health care companies with stable demand patterns;
  • Utilities with regulated returns and reliable dividend payments;
  • Energy companies that benefit from commodity price increases.

3. Alternative Investment Strategies

Consider incorporating alternative investments that may provide uncorrelated returns:

  • Real estate investment trusts with strong tenant bases;
  • Commodity exposure through exchange-traded funds or managed futures;
  • Private market investments including private equity and private debt;
  • Hedge fund strategies that focus on absolute returns.

4. Risk Management Techniques

Employ specific risk management approaches:

  • Dollar-cost averaging to reduce timing risk;
  • Options strategies to hedge downside risk;
  • Regular portfolio rebalancing to maintain target allocations;
  • Stop-loss orders on positions with significant gains.

Looking Forward

The dominance of technology companies reflects genuine technological advances and strong business models. However, students of market history should recognize that market leadership can shift rapidly. Historical examples, from the 1970s "Nifty Fifty" to the 2000s dot-com bubble, demonstrate that periods of high concentration often precede significant market adjustments.

The key to navigating these risks lies not in attempting to time the market but in building resilient portfolios that can withstand various market environments. Understanding the current risks and implementing appropriate diversification strategies can position investor portfolios to benefit from continued growth while protecting against potential market disruptions.

John O’Connell is founder and CEO of The Oasis Group, a leading consultancy for the wealth management industry.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center