Senate Nears Vote on Bill to Curb Contentious Social Security Rules

News December 20, 2024 at 12:58 PM
Share & Print

What You Need To Know

  • The legislation would repeal rules affecting some public sector retirees and their family members.
  • The GPO applies to those eligible for spousal or widowed benefits.
  • The WEP applies to those eligible for their own Social Security benefits.
/contrib/content/uploads/sites/415/2021/12/10_Social_Security_Card_640x640.jpg

The Senate is expected to resume consideration Friday of H.R.82, the Social Security Fairness Act, which would repeal the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and Government Pension Offset (GPO) provisions of Social Security.

The full House passed the bill by a 327-75 vote on Nov. 12.

The GPO applies to those eligible for spousal or widowed benefits, while the WEP applies to those eligible for their own Social Security benefits. Congress enacted legislation reducing Social Security benefits through GPO and WEP in 1977 and 1983, respectively

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said Friday that "discussions are ongoing on a path forward on that bill," as well as on the Continuing Resolution to fund the government.

On Thursday, the Senate voted to take up the House-passed Social Security Fairness Act.

"These rules prevent some public sector retirees and their family members from collecting Social Security benefits," the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare said Thursday in a statement.

"The legislation can now go to the Senate floor for a vote. If the bill passes, it goes to President Biden for his signature," the group added.

The Committee said it supports the bill "because it removes an unfairness in the system by allowing teachers, firefighters, and police officers (among others) and their families to collect Social Security benefits. Our members and supporters have made it clear that they want the WEP & GPO repealed."

Individuals who receive a pension based on work for federal, state or local government where Social Security taxes were not withheld may find their Social Security benefits reduced through these provisions.

“In enacting the WEP and GPO, Congress created a completely different set of inequities, slashing Social Security benefits for some even though their payroll contributions might be exactly the same as their fellow Americans whose work history was entirely within the Social Security system,” Richtman has argued.

"We oppose any amendments that may be offered to dilute this legislation or cut Social Security benefits in any way — including raising the retirement age," the Committee added.

The group said it sent a letter Wednesday to "all 100 U.S. Senators opposing any effort to raise the retirement age. We believe that if Republicans are concerned about costs, they should support bringing more revenue into the system by demanding that high earners pay their fair share — not by cutting benefits."

Thursday's "vote puts us one step closer to the long-sought goal of restoring fairness to a system that has worked incredibly well for nearly 90 years to provide American workers with basic financial security,” according to Max Richtman, president and CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center